lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 46/49] mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
Date
Subject says it all. Allocation failures and a failure to isolate should
be accounted as a migration failure. This is partially another
difference between base page and transhuge page migration. A base page
migration makes multiple attempts for these conditions before it would
be accounted for as a failure.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
---
mm/migrate.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index b6fe2d2..eb155c9 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1635,12 +1635,15 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,

new_page = alloc_pages_node(node,
(GFP_TRANSHUGE | GFP_THISNODE) & ~__GFP_WAIT, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
- if (!new_page)
+ if (!new_page) {
+ count_vm_events(PGMIGRATE_FAIL, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
goto out_dropref;
+ }
page_xchg_last_nid(new_page, page_last_nid(page));

isolated = numamigrate_isolate_page(pgdat, page);
if (!isolated) {
+ count_vm_events(PGMIGRATE_FAIL, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
put_page(new_page);
goto out_keep_locked;
}
--
1.7.9.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-07 13:01    [W:0.386 / U:3.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site