Messages in this thread | | | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:16:59 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/18] perf ui/hist: Add support for event group view |
| |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> wrote: > Em Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:38:40PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> > +#define __HPP_COLOR_PERCENT_FN(_type, _field) \ >> > +static int hpp__color_##_type(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he) \ >> > +{ \ >> > + int ret; \ >> > + double percent = 0.0; \ >> > + struct hists *hists = he->hists; \ >> > + \ >> > + if (hists->stats.total_period) \ >> > + percent = 100.0 * he->stat._field / hists->stats.total_period; \ >> > + \ >> > + ret = percent_color_snprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, " %6.2f%%", percent); \ >> > + \ >> > + if (symbol_conf.event_group) { \ >> > + int i; \ >> > + struct perf_evsel *evsel = hists_to_evsel(hists); \ >> > + struct hist_entry *pair; \ >> > + int nr_members = evsel->nr_members; \ >> > + double *percents; \ >> > + \ >> > + if (nr_members <= 1) \ >> > + return ret; \ >> > + \ >> > + percents = zalloc(sizeof(*percents) * nr_members); \ >> > + if (percents == NULL) { \ >> > + pr_warning("Not enough memory!\n"); \ >> > + return ret; \ >> > + } \ > > Why do we need to zalloc this percents array? > >> > + list_for_each_entry(pair, &he->pairs.head, pairs.node) { \ >> > + u64 period = pair->stat._field; \ >> > + u64 total = pair->hists->stats.total_period; \ >> > + \ >> > + if (!total) \ >> > + continue; \ >> > + \ >> > + evsel = hists_to_evsel(pair->hists); \ >> > + i = perf_evsel__group_idx(evsel); \ >> > + percents[i] = 100.0 * period / total; \ > > Why not use percent_color_snprintf here, using some "%*s" thing that > uses i to position the output in the right column? This way the > following loop can be ditched as well. No? > >> > + } \ >> > + \ >> > + for (i = 1; i < nr_members; i++) { \ >> > + ret += percent_color_snprintf(hpp->buf + ret, \ >> > + hpp->size - ret, \ >> > + " %6.2f%%", percents[i]); \ >> > + } \ >> > + free(percents); \ >> > + } \ >> > + return ret; \ > > - Arnaldo
Ah, I missed your point. Just got it now, will try this approach. So you want to see no "0.00%" for a dummy entry, right?
Thanks, Namhyung
| |