lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI AER: pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() call missing required pci_dev_put()
From
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Betty Dall <betty.dall@hp.com> wrote:
> The function aer_recover_queue() makes a call to pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> That function is documented to require that the caller decrement the
> reference count by calling pci_dev_put(). This patch adds the missing
> call to pci_dev_put().
>
> Signed-off-by: Betty Dall <betty.dall@hp.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> index af4e31c..43caf53 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c
> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ static void aer_recover_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> continue;
> }
> do_recovery(pdev, entry.severity);
> + pci_dev_put(pdev);

Are you sure pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() does indeed increment the
reference count? I see that in the comments right above the
definition.

pci_dev_get() does that for sure. I see a call trace of

pci_dev_get() -> get_device() -> kobj_to_dev(kobject_get(&dev->kobj) etc.

and kref_get() finally incrementing the

static inline void kref_get(struct kref *kref)
{
WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&kref->refcount));
atomic_inc(&kref->refcount);
}

However, I could not find any evidence that
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() does that. I see
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() calling pci_domain_nr() and there are
several architecture specific defines for pci_domain_nr(). It is not
clear to me where does refcount get incremented from
pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() is called.

What am I missing?

Thanks,
-- Shuah


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-03 19:21    [W:0.131 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site