lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: build failure after merge of the fsnotify tree
Hi Eric,

After merging the fsnotify tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc_ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

fs/notify/fdinfo.c: In function 'show_fdinfo':
fs/notify/fdinfo.c:30:18: error: 'struct fsnotify_group' has no member named 'mark_lock'
fs/notify/fdinfo.c:36:20: error: 'struct fsnotify_group' has no member named 'mark_lock'

Caused by commit 986ab09807ca ("fsnotify: use a mutex instead of a
spinlock to protect a groups mark list") interacting with commit
be77196b809c ("fs, notify: add procfs fdinfo helper") from Linus' tree
(via Andrew' tree).

I added the following merge fix patch:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:53:20 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fsnotify: cope with change from spinlock to mutex

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
fs/notify/fdinfo.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c b/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
index 514c4b8..238a593 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fdinfo.c
@@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ static int show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f,
struct fsnotify_mark *mark;
int ret = 0;

- spin_lock(&group->mark_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(mark, &group->marks_list, g_list) {
ret = show(m, mark);
if (ret)
break;
}
- spin_unlock(&group->mark_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
return ret;
}

--
1.7.10.280.gaa39
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-19 02:21    [W:0.058 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site