Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:32:35 +0100 | From | Sylwester Nawrocki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver |
| |
On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Adding base address information required for enabling > USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam<gautam.vivek@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi > @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ > > usbphy@12130000 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy"; > - reg =<0x12130000 0x100>; > + reg =<0x12130000 0x100>, > + <0x12100000 0x100>;
Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ? Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?
> samsung,usb-phyhandle =<&phy_h0&phy_h1&phy_h2>; > samsung,enable-mask =<1>; > };
| |