lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/12] cfq-iosched: implement cfq_group->nr_active and ->level_weight
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:15:17PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Vivek.
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:46:09PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:19PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > To prepare for blkcg hierarchy support, add cfqg->nr_active and
> > > ->level_weight. cfqg->nr_active counts the number of active cfqgs at
> > > the cfqg's level and ->level_weight is sum of weights of those cfqgs.
> > > The level covers itself (cfqg->leaf_weight) and immediate children.
> >
> > This notion of level is really confusing. If one says "at cfqg's level"
> > I immediately associate with cfqg's siblings and not with cfqg's children.
>
> We can explicitly say at children's level but I think it should be
> enough to explain it clearly in the comment where the field is
> defined.
>
> > I think confusion happens because we are overloading the definition of
> > cfqg. It is competing with its siblings at the same time it is competing
> > against its child groups (on behalf of its children tasks).
>
> While I agree that part is a bit tricky, I can't think of a much
> better way to describe it. Any better ideas?

Can we call it cfqg->children_weight insted of cfqg->level_weight.


Thanks
Vivek


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-18 01:21    [W:0.083 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site