lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10
Hi Mel, Ingo, 

Here are the results of running autonumabenchmark on a 64 core, 8 node
machine. Has six 32GB nodes and two 64 GB nodes.


KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc8
Testcase: Min Max Avg
numa01: 1475.37 1615.39 1555.24
numa01_HARD_BIND: 900.42 1244.00 993.30
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2835.44 5067.22 3634.86
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 918.51 1384.21 1121.17
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 599.58 1178.26 792.73
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1841.33 2237.34 1988.95
numa02: 126.95 188.31 147.04
numa02_HARD_BIND: 26.05 29.17 26.94
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 341.10 369.37 349.10
numa02_SMT: 144.32 922.65 386.43
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 26.61 170.71 101.98
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 288.12 456.45 325.26

KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc8-tip_master+(December 7th Snapshot)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 2927.89 3217.56 3103.21 -49.88%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 2653.09 5964.23 3431.35 -71.05%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 3567.03 3933.18 3811.91 -4.64%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 1801.80 2339.16 1980.96 -43.40%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 1705.84 2110.06 1913.64 -58.57%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 2266.12 2540.61 2376.67 -16.31%
numa02: 179.26 358.03 264.19 -44.34%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 26.07 29.38 27.70 -2.74%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 337.99 347.95 343.51 1.63%
numa02_SMT: 93.65 402.58 213.15 81.29%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 91.19 140.47 116.26 -12.28%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 289.03 299.57 297.01 9.51%

KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc6-mel_auto_balance(mm-balancenuma-v10r3)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 1536.93 1819.85 1694.54 -8.22%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 909.67 1145.32 1055.57 -5.90%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2882.07 3287.24 2976.89 22.10%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 995.79 4845.27 1905.85 -41.17%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 582.36 818.11 655.18 20.99%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1790.91 1927.90 1868.49 6.45%
numa02: 131.53 287.93 209.15 -29.70%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 25.68 31.90 27.66 -2.60%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 341.09 401.37 353.84 -1.34%
numa02_SMT: 156.61 2036.63 731.97 -47.21%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 25.10 196.60 79.72 27.92%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 294.22 1801.59 824.41 -60.55%

KernelVersion: 3.7.0-rc6-autonuma+(mm-autonuma-v28fastr4-mels-rebase)
Testcase: Min Max Avg %Change
numa01: 1596.13 1715.34 1649.44 -5.71%
numa01_HARD_BIND: 920.75 1127.86 1012.50 -1.90%
numa01_INVERSE_BIND: 2858.79 3146.74 2977.16 22.09%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC: 250.55 374.27 290.12 286.45%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_HARD_BIND: 572.29 712.74 630.62 25.71%
numa01_THREAD_ALLOC_INVERSE_BIND: 1835.94 2401.04 2011.20 -1.11%
numa02: 33.93 104.80 50.99 188.37%
numa02_HARD_BIND: 25.94 27.51 26.42 1.97%
numa02_INVERSE_BIND: 334.57 349.51 341.23 2.31%
numa02_SMT: 43.72 114.82 62.41 519.18%
numa02_SMT_HARD_BIND: 34.98 45.61 42.07 142.41%
numa02_SMT_INVERSE_BIND: 284.57 310.62 298.51 8.96%

Avg refers to mean of 5 iterations of autonuma-benchmark.
%Change refers to percentage change from 3.7-rc8

Please do let me know if you have questions/suggestions.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-10 19:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans