lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [braindump][RFC] signals and syscall restarts (Re: [PATCH v2 19/44] metag: Signal handling)
On 06/12/12 22:09, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:17:34AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:
>
>> Agreed, it looks wrong. Looking at the sh version, is there a particular
>> reason to only check for -EFAULT and not the other errors that
>> do_sigaltstack can return (-EPERM, -EINVAL, and -ENOMEM)?
>
> See commit fae2ae2a900a5c7bb385fe4075f343e7e2d5daa2

Thanks :)

>
>>> BTW, what's to stop the syscall restart triggering if you catch a signal
>>> while in rt_sigreturn(2)?
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand how that could cause a problem. Could you
>> elaborate the sequence of events?
>>
>> The signal restart is triggered by the return value register, so
>> rt_sigreturn would have to return -ERESTART*. This could happen if the
>> signal handler overwrote the return value in the sigcontext (which as
>> far as I can tell could also happen on ARM), or if the syscall that was
>> originally interrupted by the signal has -ERESTARTNOINTR ||
>> (-ERESTARTSYS && SA_RESTART), but in that case rt_sigreturn has already
>> switched back to the context of the original syscall so that's the right
>> thing to do isn't it? I've probably missed something important :-)
>
> [we probably need something along the lines of braindump below in
> somewhere in Documentation/*; comments and improvements are very
> welcome - this is just a starting point. We *do* need some coherent
> explanation of signal semantics, judging by how often people step on
> the same landmines...]

Thanks, this helps a lot.

Cheers
James



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-10 12:01    [W:0.123 / U:0.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site