Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:54:57 +0100 | | From | Michal Hocko <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/9] cgroup: implement generic child / descendant walk macros |
| |
On Sat 03-11-12 01:38:29, Tejun Heo wrote: [...] > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c > index cc5d2a0..8bd662c 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c > @@ -2985,6 +2985,92 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void) > write_unlock(&css_set_lock); > } > > +/** > + * cgroup_next_descendant_pre - find the next descendant for pre-order walk > + * @pos: the current position (%NULL to initiate traversal) > + * @cgroup: cgroup whose descendants to walk > + * > + * To be used by cgroup_for_each_descendant_pre(). Find the next > + * descendant to visit for pre-order traversal of @cgroup's descendants. > + */ > +struct cgroup *cgroup_next_descendant_pre(struct cgroup *pos, > + struct cgroup *cgroup) > +{ > + struct cgroup *next; > + > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); > + > + /* if first iteration, pretend we just visited @cgroup */ > + if (!pos) { > + if (list_empty(&cgroup->children)) > + return NULL; > + pos = cgroup; > + }
Is there any specific reason why the root of the tree is excluded? This is bit impractical because you have to special case the root in the code.
> + > + /* visit the first child if exists */ > + next = list_first_or_null_rcu(&pos->children, struct cgroup, sibling); > + if (next) > + return next; > + > + /* no child, visit my or the closest ancestor's next sibling */ > + do { > + next = list_entry_rcu(pos->sibling.next, struct cgroup, > + sibling); > + if (&next->sibling != &pos->parent->children) > + return next; > + > + pos = pos->parent; > + } while (pos != cgroup); > + > + return NULL; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cgroup_next_descendant_pre); [...]
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
|  |