Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Philip, Avinash"
- "Bedia, Vaibhav"
- "Bedia, Vaibhav"
- "Bedia, Vaibhav"
- "Bedia, Vaibhav"
| | | From | "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: OMAP: AM33xx hwmod: Add parent-child relationship for PWM subsystem | Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:06:21 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 15:39:11, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 14:42:24, Philip, Avinash wrote: > [...] > > > + > > +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if am33xx_epwmss0__ecap0 = { > > + .master = &am33xx_epwmss0_hwmod, > > + .slave = &am33xx_ecap0_hwmod, > > + .clk = "l4ls_gclk", > > + .addr = am33xx_ecap0_addr_space, > > + .user = OCP_USER_MPU, > > +}; > > Noticed this in another patch which is quite similar so commenting here > again. Is the user field required if you are just creating a parent-child > relationship here? >
I think user field is not related to parent-child nodes, it defines the initiator to interact with hwmod
Copy-pasted from "arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_hwmod.h"
"indicate the initiators that use this interface to interact with the hwmod"
And in this case, its MPU is the initiator to interact with this interface.
Thanks, Vaibhav > Regards, > Vaibhav > >
| |