lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank cpufreq
    > The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
    > just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.

    Ah, right. How did I forget about that nice piece?

    > I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
    > call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a
    > regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
    > hit when trying to make a general solution.

    So, how is your "reentrancy in the common clk framework" series[1]
    going on? Haven't seen any update since August.

    Shawn

    [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182198



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-11-29 03:21    [W:4.020 / U:0.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site