Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:39:10 +0100 | From | Michal Marek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] scripts/kernel-doc: check that non-void fcts describe their return value |
| |
On 27.11.2012 02:43, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/26/2012 01:22 PM, Yacine Belkadi wrote: > >> If a function has a return value, but its kernel-doc comment doesn't contain a >> "Return" section, then emit the following warning: >> >> Warning(file.h:129): No description found for return value of 'fct' >> >> Note: This check emits a lot of warnings at the moment, because many functions >> don't have a 'Return' doc section. So until the number of warnings goes >> sufficiently down, the check is only performed in verbose mode. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com> > > > Both patches: > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > > Michal, please merge patches 1 and 2.
Thanks for the review and for adding me to CC. Yacine, could you please resend the patches? I got unsubscribed from lkml yesterday, because my @suse mail was bouncing :(.
Thanks, Michal
| |