Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:50:53 -0800 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] x86, boot: add fields to support load bzImage and ramdisk high |
| |
On 11/22/2012 12:18 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> If we can get the sentinel hack to work that would probably be useful, but >> we need to understand the exact pathology. > > for kexec bzImage --real-mode-entry, code after setup_header will be executed. > > so we could clear value before setup_header after copy 16bit section > from bzImage... > > Index: kexec-tools/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-bzImage.c > =================================================================== > --- kexec-tools.orig/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-bzImage.c > +++ kexec-tools/kexec/arch/i386/kexec-bzImage.c > @@ -212,6 +212,16 @@ int do_bzImage_load(struct kexec_info *i > setup_size = kern16_size + command_line_len + PURGATORY_CMDLINE_SIZE; > real_mode = xmalloc(setup_size); > memcpy(real_mode, kernel, kern16_size); > + /* > + * clear value before header > + * not not clear value after header, --real-mode-entry > + * need code after header. > + */ > + memset(real_mode, 0, 0x1f1); > + if (!real_mode_entry) { > + /* clear value after setup_header */ > + memset((unsigned char *)real_mode + 0x290, 0, kern16_size - 0x290); > + } >
You really should move the memset() into the if() clause as well... doesn't matter at the moment, but that is the protocol.
The limit is 0x280, not 0x290, or -- better -- you can use the byte at 0x201 to get the size.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|  |