Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:30:21 +0530 | | From | Santosh Shilimkar <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE |
| |
On Monday 29 October 2012 06:58 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 24 October 2012 17:21, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote: >> On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: >>> >>> The ARM platforms take advantage of packing small tasks on few cores. >>> This is true even when the cores of a cluster can't be powergated >>> independently. >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 5 +++++ >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >>> index 26c12c6..00511d0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c >>> @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static inline void update_cpu_power(unsigned int >>> cpuid, unsigned int mpidr) {} >>> */ >>> struct cputopo_arm cpu_topology[NR_CPUS]; >>> >>> +int arch_sd_share_power_line(void) >>> +{ >>> + return 0*SD_SHARE_POWERLINE; >>> +} >> >> >> Making this selection of policy based on sched domain will better. Just >> gives the flexibility to choose a separate scheme for big and little >> systems which will be very convenient. > > I agree that it would be more flexible to be able to set it for each level > Will you be addressing that in next version then ?
Regards santosh
|  |