Hi Paul
> I know of people using TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but I
> have not heard of anyone using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU for whom TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> was not a viable option (in contrast, the people running Linux on
> tiny-memmory systems typically use TINY_RCU).  Of course, if no one
> really needs it, the proper thing to do is to remove it.
> 
> So, if you need TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, please let me know.  Otherwise, I will
> remove it, probably in the 3.9 timeframe.
I am using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU on the i.mx35 platform. I am currently on 3.4-rt 
since the 3.6 compile failed due to for my config? Some strange device tree 
stuff which i haven't had the time to figure out why.

Best regards
Tim