lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: scsi target, likely GPL violation
From
Date
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:15 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> James wrote:
> >> [I'd like to see] a genuine public apology for the libel...
> >> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of
> this
> >> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.

Hey that's a complete misrepresentation. I expressed no such opinion in
the email.

What I said was:

> I would really appreciate it if the next email I see from you on this
> subject is either
>
> 1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
> we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
> 2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
> prevail on RTS to accept.
>
> Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.

That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
facts. It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.

James




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-11 20:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site