On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Ortwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> wrote:
> On 08.11.2012 15:14, Luming Yu wrote:
>>>
>>> hmm....make sens? maybe we can't use tmp-on-tmpfs feature in f18
>>
>> but why not having disk to backup tmpfs under memory pressure?
>
>
> It should. tmpfs should use all available RAM+swap. But then I guess you
there is swap space available, but somehow it didn't help as the attached pic
shows in my latest testing with 3.7.0-rc4

> have no swap, and the kernel simply is desperately trying to find memory for
> a slab/slub or whatever. OOM killer can't help because the temp file uses
> the space, not a process.
>
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]