Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:06:34 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:03:20PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:50 -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > What do we have to do to prevent Linux being used to attack Linux > > which may lead to secure boot being useless. > > That's not really remotely related, is it? Microsoft doesn't really > care about Linux on Linux attacks, so preventing or allowing them isn't > going to get a distro key revoked.
Linux vendors may care about Linux on Linux attacks. It's all fun and games until Oracle get Microsoft to revoke Red Hat's signature.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |