Messages in this thread | | | From | Chris Wilson <> | Subject | Re: 3.5 regression on i915 | Date | Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:43:08 +0100 |
| |
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:20:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > The crash happens here in i915_gem_entervt_ioctl() : > > > > > > 3659 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list)); > > > 3660 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list)); > > > -> 3661 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.inactive_list)); > > > 3662 mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > > > That BUG_ON there is silly and can simply be removed. The check is to > > verify that no batches were submitted to the kernel whilst the UMS/GEM > > client was suspended - to which the BUG_ONs are a crude approximation. > > Furthermore, the checks are too late, since it means we attempted to > > program the hardware whilst it was in an invalid state, the BUG_ONs are > > the least of your concerns at that point. > > Excellent, that fixed it ! X still segfaults when KMS is used, but > I expect more of a pure user-space issue here since there is nothing > in dmesg. > > Would some of you accept the following patch and tag it for -stable ?
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris
-- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
| |