lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:44:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > That does still leave me a little uneasy as far as the microcode
> > licenses go. I don't know that we can distribute signed copies of some
> > of them, and we obviously can't sign at the user end.
>
> You seem to put them in signed rpm packages ?

That's not a modification of the files that say "You have permission to
distribute unmodified versions of this file". If a lawyer says this is
fine, I'm happy.

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-31 19:21    [W:0.230 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site