Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:39:19 +0000 | | From | Alan Cox <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support |
| |
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:17:43 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:21:21PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:10:48 +0000 > > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > > The kernel is signed. The kernel doesn't check the signature on the > > > suspend image. > > > > Which doesn't matter. How are you going to create the tampered image in > > the first place ? > > By booting a signed kernel, not turning on swap and writing directly to > the swap partition.
Ok so the actual problem is that you are signing kernels that allow the user to skip the S4 resume check ?
|  |