Messages in this thread | | | From | Sasha Levin <> | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:36:21 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable |
| |
Hi Linus,
> But whatever. This series has gotten way too much bike-shedding > anyway. I think it should just be applied, since it does remove lines > of code overall. I'd even possibly apply it to mainline, but it seems > to be against linux-next.
Yup, I switched to using -next because I've been running my trinity/KVM tools tests with it.
I can either rebase that on top of mainline, or we can ask maintainers to take it to their own trees if you take only 01/16 into mainline. What would you prefer?
Thanks, Sasha
| |