| Date | Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:41:39 -0700 | From | Juri Lelli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/16] math128: Introduce various 128bit primitives |
| |
On 10/26/2012 11:28 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 11:12 -0700, Juri Lelli wrote: > >> - scale down (right by 10) incoming parameters as to do internal >> math with ~1us resolution (and scale up outgoing params) > > Would scaling down by 9 be sufficient? That way the resolution is still > just less than 1us. >
I don't see any practical issue. Anyway, if, - as Thomas said - "It's really pointless to even think about anything below microseconds resolution", having an internal resolution just above a microsecond sounds to me easier to justify to users. But I'm pretty open about this :).
Thanks and Regards,
- Juri
|