Messages in this thread | | | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] struct pid-ify autofs4 | Date | Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:59:36 +0200 |
| |
> Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes: > > > Yeah, the problem with that is that "autofs doesn't work if containers > > are used" is ill defined since there are use cases where it does, I > > believe. At the very least, ill defined in my view of things.
Customer says:
"There is no interaction between host and the conatainer. The host use only his own automount and each containers used automount in their container."
I think it's a pretty clearly defined use case. And one which automount could easily support since the only requirement is that all namespaces are treated equally.
But I agree that adding safeguards against cases which don't have such easily defined semantics (such as triggers from several different namespaces).
I'll post updated patches.
Thanks, Miklos
| |