lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] struct pid-ify autofs4
Date
> Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> writes:
>
> > Yeah, the problem with that is that "autofs doesn't work if containers
> > are used" is ill defined since there are use cases where it does, I
> > believe. At the very least, ill defined in my view of things.

Customer says:

"There is no interaction between host and the conatainer. The host use
only his own automount and each containers used automount in their
container."

I think it's a pretty clearly defined use case. And one which automount
could easily support since the only requirement is that all namespaces
are treated equally.

But I agree that adding safeguards against cases which don't have such
easily defined semantics (such as triggers from several different
namespaces).

I'll post updated patches.

Thanks,
Miklos



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-24 17:41    [W:0.119 / U:1.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site