On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:57:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just a minor nitpicking..
> 
> 
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:33:11 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Changing the way we retrieve the event ID. Instead of parsing out
> > the ID out of the read data, using the PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID ioctl.
> >
> > Keeping the old way in place to support kernels without
> > PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID ioctl support.
> [snip]
> > +	} else if (errno)
> > +		return -1;
> 
> Is this check really needed?  I think that returning non-zero from the
> ioctl always sets the errno, no?  How about this:
> 
> 	ret = ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID, &id);
> 	if (!ret)
> 		goto add;
> 
> 	if (errno != ENOTTY)
> 		return -1;
> 
> 	...
> 
> I guess that it'll show you better diff stat. :)

yep, looks better.. v2 candidate ;)

thanks,
jirka