Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:38:49 +0200 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/11] perf tool: Add PERF_SAMPLE_READ sample read support |
| |
* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi, > adding support to read sample values through the PERF_SAMPLE_READ > sample type. It's now possible to specify 'S' modifier for an event > and get its sample value by PERF_SAMPLE_READ. > > For group the 'S' modifier will enable sampling only for the leader > and read all the group member by PERF_SAMPLE_READ smple type with > PERF_FORMAT_GROUP read format. > > This patchset is based on group report patches by Namhyung Kim: > http://lwn.net/Articles/518569/ > > Example: > (making sample on cycles, reading both cycles and cache-misses > by PERF_SAMPLE_READ/PERF_FORMAT_GROUP) > > # ./perf record -e '{cycles,cache-misses}:S' ls > ... > > # ./perf report --group --show-total-period --stdio > # ======== > # captured on: Sat Oct 20 16:53:39 2012 > ... > # group: {cycles,cache-misses} > # ======== > # > # Samples: 86 of event 'anon group { cycles, cache-misses }' > # Event count (approx.): 34863674 > # > # Overhead Period Command Shared Object Symbol > # ................ ........................ ....... ................. ................................
Might make sense to consider this column enumeration:
# # cycles # | cache-misses # | | > # v v > # > 16.56% 19.47% 5773450 475 ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_sched_clock > 10.87% 0.74% 3789088 18 ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] rtl8169_interrupt > 9.82% 15.86% 3423364 387 ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mark_lock > 8.43% 17.75% 2938384 433 ls ld-2.14.90.so [.] do_lookup_x > 6.79% 20.86% 2365622 509 ls ls [.] calculate_columns > 6.36% 0.61% 2216808 15 ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_release > ...
/me wants this feature ASAP :-)
This should probably be the out of box default for perf record and perf top as well - the cache miss rate is probably one of the least appreciated aspects of overhead analysis.
Does it have sane output if the cache-misses event is not supported? The cache-misses column should probably stay empty in that case - basically falling back to today's default output.
Thanks,
Ingo
|  |