Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:07:33 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] rename NUMA fault handling functions |
| |
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Having the function name indicate what the function is used >> for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore, >> the fault handling code largely consists of do_...._page >> functions. > > I don't much care either way, but I was thinking walken might want to > use something similar to do WSS estimation, in which case the NUMA name > is just as wrong.
That's a good point. I had not considered other uses of the same code.
-- All rights reversed
| |