Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] rename NUMA fault handling functions | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:03 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Having the function name indicate what the function is used > for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore, > the fault handling code largely consists of do_...._page > functions.
I don't much care either way, but I was thinking walken might want to use something similar to do WSS estimation, in which case the NUMA name is just as wrong.
| |