Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:02:02 +0100 | From | David Vrabel <> | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). |
| |
On 18/10/12 18:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> As for 'perf', since Xen already provides a virtual PMU for HVM guests >> It's not clear why we would spend the effort to implement another >> mechanism for PV guests (instead of using the virtual PMU from a PVH guest). > > Would that allow one to evaluate the performance/bottlenecks that the > hypervisor might have?
Not right now, no. But I don't so why it couldn't be possible.
David
| |