lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools
>>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> + for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) {
>
> Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ?

For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the
canonical form.

Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-01 12:21    [W:0.319 / U:0.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site