lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch] Remove proposed ABI change for setitimer(2)
Commit aa2bf9bc6414b6972b9e51903c1ce7b1f057aee2 scheduled an ABI
change for setitimer() whose rationale is dubious. The standards
are largely silent on the point referred to in that commit's
changelog. In addition, current behavior is causing no reported
hardship for user-space. So, there are no benefits to the change,
and making it risks breaking userspace applications that rely
on the (so far undocumented) Linux behavior. Finally, if one even
contemplated making a change to the ABI on this point, the sensible
change would be to make Linux behave as Solaris and the BSDs where:
setitimer(..., NULL, &ovalue) == getitimer(..., &ovalue)

The sensible thing is no change at all. This patch removes the
scheduled change from feature-removal-schedule.txt.

Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.man-pages@gmail.com>

---
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index f4d8c71..cdf4ded 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -528,14 +528,6 @@ Who: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

----------------------------

-What: setitimer accepts user NULL pointer (value)
-When: 3.6
-Why: setitimer is not returning -EFAULT if user pointer is NULL. This
- violates the spec.
-Who: Sasikantha Babu <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
-
-----------------------------
-
What: remove bogus DV presets V4L2_DV_1080I29_97, V4L2_DV_1080I30 and
V4L2_DV_1080I25
When: 3.6

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-01 10:41    [W:0.041 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site