[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] topology: Check for missing CPU devices
    On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
    <> wrote:
    > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Linus Torvalds
    > <> wrote:
    >> Ok, both of the patches look sane to me, but it would really be nice
    >> to hear from somebody with the actual affected architectures, and get
    >> a tested-by.
    > UML is affected:
    > I wasted an hour finding out why it is crashing.
    > Instead of testing kernels I really should read more LKML. ;-)


    Ben - how about that

    static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);

    approach that Richard uses in his patch, instead of the kcalloc? And
    clearly UM should also do that CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES thing with
    your patch.

    Richard - does Ben's patch work for you too if you just add "select
    GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES" in the UM Kconfig too (Kconfig.common, probably)?


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-09 02:31    [W:0.019 / U:5.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site