[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] topology: Check for missing CPU devices
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
<> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <> wrote:
>> Ok, both of the patches look sane to me, but it would really be nice
>> to hear from somebody with the actual affected architectures, and get
>> a tested-by.
> UML is affected:
> I wasted an hour finding out why it is crashing.
> Instead of testing kernels I really should read more LKML. ;-)


Ben - how about that

static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);

approach that Richard uses in his patch, instead of the kcalloc? And
clearly UM should also do that CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES thing with
your patch.

Richard - does Ben's patch work for you too if you just add "select
GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES" in the UM Kconfig too (Kconfig.common, probably)?


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-09 02:31    [W:0.075 / U:5.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site