lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2012.1] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories

* Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com> wrote:

> > >> +config PROTECTED_STICKY_SYMLINKS
> > >> +     bool "Protect symlink following in sticky world-writable directories"
> > >> +     default y
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Why do we need a config option for this?  What's wrong
> > > with just using the sysctl?
> >
> > This way the sysctl can configured directly without needing
> > to have a distro add a new item to sysctl.conf.
>
> This seems totally pointless to me. [...]

It's how we add new features typically. From a distro's POV
.config's are a lot more durable than system specific
sysctl.conf's.

User can of course still override via the sysctl.conf, but the
kernel (and the distro) wants to provide a sane default that
does not depend on userspace settings.

Also, there are people who test new kernels but don't want to
change the underlying distro. Twiddling such .config values is
quite straightforward for them.

> [...] There are tons of sysctls that don't have Kconfig
> options: what makes this one special?

Those are old mistakes we want to forget about.

> > > Why have you made this option "default y", when enabling
> > > it clearly makes user-visible changes to kernel behaviour?
> >
> > Ingo specifically asked me to make it "default y".
>
> But this is a brand new feature that changes longstanding
> behaviour of various syscalls. Making it default to enabled
> is rather mean to users (since it will tend to get enabled by
> "oldconfig") and seems almost guaranteed to cause regressions.

The changelog of the feature (which feature has been in use for
years in various [admittedly smaller] distros) says that it does
not break apps.

Worth a try: it will be very easy to flip it back if it causes a
regression - but we'd like it to have at least *some* testing in
the merge window to see whether there *is* some broken (or not
so broken) app that relies on the current semantics.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-06 08:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans