lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock
Grabbing tasklist_lock has its disadvantages, i.e. it blocks
process creation and destruction. If there are lots of processes,
blocking doesn't sound as a great idea.

For LMK, it is sufficient to surround tasks list traverse loop
with rcu_read_{,un}lock() pair.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
---
Also thanks to Eric and Paul for the ideas.

drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
index 2d8d2b7..b3ade2f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/profile.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>

@@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ static int lowmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
}
selected_oom_adj = min_adj;

- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(p) {
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct signal_struct *sig;
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ static int lowmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
}
lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_shrink %lu, %x, return %d\n",
sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, rem);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return rem;
}

--
1.7.7.6

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-01 05:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans