[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] coupled cpuidle state support
On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>> <> wrote:
>>> Hi Colin,
>>> this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu
>>> dependencies.
>>> What is the status of this patchset ?
>> I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices
>> that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel. I've started working on an
>> updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while
>> before I can test and post it. I'm mostly looking for feedback on the
>> approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other
>> SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4.
> Hi Colin,
> I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more
> recent kernel ?

Hi Colin,

sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP
board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits
with the cpuidle driver.

-- Daniel

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-31 15:15    [W:0.055 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site