[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] coupled cpuidle state support
    On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
    > On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
    >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
    >> <> wrote:
    >>> Hi Colin,
    >>> this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu
    >>> dependencies.
    >>> What is the status of this patchset ?
    >> I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices
    >> that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel. I've started working on an
    >> updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while
    >> before I can test and post it. I'm mostly looking for feedback on the
    >> approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other
    >> SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4.
    > Hi Colin,
    > I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more
    > recent kernel ?

    Hi Colin,

    sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP
    board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits
    with the cpuidle driver.

    -- Daniel

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-31 15:15    [W:0.028 / U:3.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site