Messages in this thread |  | | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume | Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:37:18 -0800 |
| |
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite >> >> popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and >> >> hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core >> >> use them during system power transitions. >> >> >> >> [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices. >> >> [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases. >> >> >> >> The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree. >> >> >> >> These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1 >> >> without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising. Also, >> >> they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than >> >> adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths. >> > >> > The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and >> > I've added a PM domains patch on top of them: >> > >> > [3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases. >> > >> > The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should >> > apply on top of the current mainline too). >> > >> > I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections. >> >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> >> >> Thanks Rafael for working on this. >> >> So far I've only reviewed it, but I plan to convert my PM domain noirq >> usage to this and give it some testing as well, hopefully this week. > > Great, thanks! >
OK, I gave it a test on OMAP by converting our _noirq usage to the new early/late callbacks. Works great. Thanks!
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Kevin
|  |