lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Bad SSD performance with recent kernels
From
Date
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:13 +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:17:38AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > 2012/1/30 Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>:
> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 02:13:51PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> Le dimanche 29 janvier 2012 à 19:16 +0800, Wu Fengguang a écrit :
>
>
> >>>> Note that as long as buffered read(2) is used, it makes almost no
> >>>> difference (well, at least for now) to do "dd bs=128k" or "dd bs=2MB":
> >>>> the 128kb readahead size will be used underneath to submit read IO.
>
>
> >>> Hmm...
>
> >>> # echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=128k count=32768
> >>> 32768+0 enregistrements lus
> >>> 32768+0 enregistrements écrits
> >>> 4294967296 octets (4,3 GB) copiés, 20,7718 s, 207 MB/s
>
>
> >>> # echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=2M count=2048
> >>> 2048+0 enregistrements lus
> >>> 2048+0 enregistrements écrits
> >>> 4294967296 octets (4,3 GB) copiés, 27,7824 s, 155 MB/s
>
> >> Interesting. Here are my test results:
>
> >> root@lkp-nex04 /home/wfg# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=128k count=32768
> >> 32768+0 records in
> >> 32768+0 records out
> >> 4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 19.0121 s, 226 MB/s
> >> root@lkp-nex04 /home/wfg# echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ;dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=2M count=2048
> >> 2048+0 records in
> >> 2048+0 records out
> >> 4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 19.0214 s, 226 MB/s
>
> >> Maybe the /dev/sda performance bug on your machine is sensitive to timing?
> > I got similar result:
> > 128k: 224M/s
> > 1M: 182M/s
>
> > 1M block size is slow, I guess it's CPU related.
>
> > And as for the big regression with newer kernel than 2.6.38,
> > please check if idle=poll helps. CPU idle dramatically impacts
> > disk performance and even latest cpuidle governor doesn't help
> > for some CPUs.
>
> here are the tests with idle=poll and after switching to 128k
> (instead of 1M) blocksize (same amount of data transferred)
>
> kernel ------------ read /dev/sda -------------
> --- noop --- - deadline - ---- cfs ---
> [MB/s] %CPU [MB/s] %CPU [MB/s] %CPU
> --------------------------------------------------
> 3.2.2 45.82 3.7 44.85 3.6 45.04 3.4
> 3.2.2i 45.59 2.3 51.78 2.6 46.03 2.2
> 3.2.2i128 250.24 20.9 252.68 21.3 250.00 21.6
>
> kernel -- write --- ------------------read -----------------
> --- noop --- --- noop --- - deadline - ---- cfs ---
> [MB/s] %CPU [MB/s] %CPU [MB/s] %CPU [MB/s] %CPU
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 3.2.2 270.95 42.6 162.36 9.9 162.63 9.9 162.65 10.1
> 3.2.2i 269.10 41.4 170.82 6.6 171.20 6.6 170.91 6.7
> 3.2.2i128 270.38 67.7 162.35 10.2 163.01 10.3 162.34 10.7
What's 3.2.2i and 3.2.2i128? does idle=poll help?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-30 08:27    [W:0.067 / U:5.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site