[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs/ext4: add missing ext4_resize_end
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:14:20AM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> Thanks.
> The patch looks good. I have to update the new resize patch too.
> Yongqiang.
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Djalal Harouni <> wrote:
> > Online resize ioctls 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND' and 'EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD'
> > call ext4_resize_begin() to check permissions and to set the
> > EXT4_RESIZING bit lock, they do their work and they must finish with
> > ext4_resize_end() which calls clear_bit_unlock() to unlock and to
> > avoid -EBUSY errors for the next resize operations.
> >
> > This patch adds the missing ext4_resize_end() calls on error paths.
Any news on this one ?

If we call EXT4_IOC_GROUP_EXTEND ioctl and get_user() fails with -EFAULT
then any new call will return -EBUSY, unless we unmount/mount the fs.

In rare situations this can lead to a corrupt filesystem, I've experienced
this, but I'm not sure what I did. fsck fix it.



 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-03 11:47    [W:0.052 / U:15.932 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site