[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [RFC][PATCH v3 2/3] Skip spin_locks in panic case and add WARN_ON()

>But this seems pretty clear that we don't need to self-NMI.

Thank you for your explanation.
Now I understand that we don't need self-NMI and efi_pstore can blindly continue in panic path
because setvariable() will succeed even if the previous call that took the exception didn't succeed.

I will submit an updated patch by removing spin_lock of efi_pstore_write() in panic path.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-03 19:25    [W:0.046 / U:45.608 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site