Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Date | Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:44:04 +0100 | | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | | Subject | ptrace fixes for 3.2 |
| |
On 01/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I am going to send the hack^Wpatch below to Linus as a temporary > workaround for 3.2.
The same patch with the changelog.
Denys, Tejun, any chance you can review it before I send it to Linus ?
Also, I am going to send this one:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131705871825598&w=2
could you please take a look?
Oleg.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [PATCH] ptrace: partially fix the do_wait(WEXITED) vs EXIT_DEAD->EXIT_ZOMBIE race
Test-case:
int main(void) { int pid, status;
pid = fork(); if (!pid) { for (;;) { if (!fork()) return 0; if (waitpid(-1, &status, 0) < 0) { printf("ERR!! wait: %m\n"); return 0; } } }
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0,0) == 0); assert(waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) == pid);
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACEFORK) == 0);
do { ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0, 0); pid = waitpid(-1, NULL, 0); } while (pid > 0);
return 1; }
It fails because ->real_parent sees its child in EXIT_DEAD state while the tracer is going to change the state back to EXIT_ZOMBIE in wait_task_zombie().
The offending commit is 823b018e which moved the EXIT_DEAD check, but in fact we should not blame it. The original code was not correct as well because it didn't take ptrace_reparented() into account and because we can't really trust ->ptrace.
This patch adds the additional check to close this particular race but it doesn't solve the whole problem. We simply can't rely on ->ptrace in this case, it can be cleared if the tracer is multithreaded by the exiting ->parent.
I think we should kill EXIT_DEAD altogether, we should always remove the soon-to-be-reaped child from ->children or at least we should never do the DEAD->ZOMBIE transition. But this is too complex for 3.2.
Also, I think wait_consider_task() needs more fixes. I do not think we should clear ->notask_error without WEXITED in this case, but this is what we do in the EXIT_ZOMBIE case.
Reported-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> Cc: v3.0.. <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> --- kernel/exit.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index d0b7d98..e6e01b9 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -1540,8 +1540,15 @@ static int wait_consider_task(struct wait_opts *wo, int ptrace, } /* dead body doesn't have much to contribute */ - if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD) + if (unlikely(p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)) { + /* + * But do not ignore this task until the tracer does + * wait_task_zombie()->do_notify_parent(). + */ + if (likely(!ptrace) && unlikely(ptrace_reparented(p))) + wo->notask_error = 0; return 0; + } /* slay zombie? */ if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) { -- 1.5.5.1
|  |