lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: add missing block_bio_complete() tracepoint
2012-01-30 10:47 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:44:19 AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> The userland tool cannot distinguish bounced bio from original one
>> at completion TP, but it can expect there will be a duplicated
>> BLK_TA_COMPLETE as it sees BLK_TA_BOUNCE for the bio before.
>>
>> Filtering it out from kernel side seems to hide a real information
>> that (paranoid?) user might want to get, and it looks like providing
>> "polcy not mechanism" IMHO. That's why I changed my mind finally.
>>
>> I cannot think of the downside, anyway it's not a big deal, if you
>> think it's wrong choice, I'm OK to change it again.
>
> It's just that this patch as it stands will break the existing tools
> and is likely to cause some amount of head scratching for blktrace
> users upgrading to new kernel with existing userland, so yeah, I think
> it should be filtered in kernel from blktrace.c.
>
> Thanks.
>

Will it break blktrace? Looking at the code, not tested though, it will
just add one more 'C' line for bounced bio, and that's it? The blktrace
will get way more 'C' lines for normal request based devices and it
needs to be handled anyway. Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Namhyung


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-30 03:25    [W:0.076 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site