lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 3/8] ARM: tegra: rework Tegra secondary CPU core bringup
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:25:53PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Peter De Schrijver wrote at Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:07 AM:
> > Prepare the Tegra secondary CPU core bringup code for other Tegra variants.
> > The reset handler is also generalized to allow for future introduction of
> > powersaving modes which turn off the CPU cores.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/headsmp.S
>
> > ENTRY(tegra_secondary_startup)
> ...
> > + enable_coresight r0
>
> > +ENTRY(__tegra_cpu_reset_handler)
> > +
> > +#if DEBUG_CPU_RESET_HANDLER
> > + enable_coresight r0
> > + b .
> > +#endif
>
> I'm not sure why the macro call enable_coresight is ifdef'd in one place
> but not the other... Should just the instruction "b ." be inside the
> ifdef?
>

This code path will also be used by LP2 and LP1 resume in the future, I'm not
sure we should unconditionally enable Coresight in that case.

> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c
>
> > +static void tegra_cpu_reset_handler_enable(void)
>
> > + /*
> > + * Prevent further modifications to the physical reset vector.
> > + * NOTE: Has no effect on chips prior to Tegra30.
> > + */
> > + reg = readl(sb_ctrl);
> > + reg |= 2;
> > + writel(reg, sb_ctrl);
> > + wmb();
>
> Should we skip that on Tegra20 then?
>

Might make sense. OTOH the bit is just unused on Tegra20 so the write doesn't
cause any harm.

> > +void __init tegra_cpu_reset_handler_init(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long *cpu_reset_data_start, *cpu_reset_data_end;
>
> Those variables are unused.

Indeed... Leftover from the past...

Cheers,

Peter.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-27 09:21    [W:0.070 / U:6.492 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site