[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (net/sock.h, jump_label, memcg)
    On 01/27/2012 01:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:31:13 +0400 Glauber Costa<> wrote:
    >> On the specifics of this bug, I verified this config compiles okay in
    >> your tree + my patches at the day I last sent them. I also verified it
    >> breaks on the tree today.
    >> The reason seems to be that some other patch tweaked with the header
    >> files in an unrelated patch, and the static_branch definition that was
    >> getting to us in sock.h, is no longer getting there.
    >> Including it explicitly fixes it here. I will again pass through a
    >> battery of randconfigs on my own, and send you a fix.
    > Which is one of the reasons we have Rule 1 in Documentation/SubmitChecklist:
    > 1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
    > that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
    > that you use.
    I understand that. I wasn't saying I am not to blame, just why this
    wasn't catched in any test of mine before.

    The fix is on its way.

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-26 22:51    [W:0.024 / U:67.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site