[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (net/sock.h, jump_label, memcg)
On 01/27/2012 01:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:31:13 +0400 Glauber Costa<> wrote:
>> On the specifics of this bug, I verified this config compiles okay in
>> your tree + my patches at the day I last sent them. I also verified it
>> breaks on the tree today.
>> The reason seems to be that some other patch tweaked with the header
>> files in an unrelated patch, and the static_branch definition that was
>> getting to us in sock.h, is no longer getting there.
>> Including it explicitly fixes it here. I will again pass through a
>> battery of randconfigs on my own, and send you a fix.
> Which is one of the reasons we have Rule 1 in Documentation/SubmitChecklist:
> 1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
> that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
> that you use.
I understand that. I wasn't saying I am not to blame, just why this
wasn't catched in any test of mine before.

The fix is on its way.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-26 22:51    [W:0.045 / U:5.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site