lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume
Date
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite
> >> popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and
> >> hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core
> >> use them during system power transitions.
> >>
> >> [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices.
> >> [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases.
> >>
> >> The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree.
> >>
> >> These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1
> >> without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising. Also,
> >> they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than
> >> adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths.
> >
> > The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and
> > I've added a PM domains patch on top of them:
> >
> > [3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases.
> >
> > The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should
> > apply on top of the current mainline too).
> >
> > I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>
> Thanks Rafael for working on this.
>
> So far I've only reviewed it, but I plan to convert my PM domain noirq
> usage to this and give it some testing as well, hopefully this week.

Great, thanks!

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-25 23:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans