[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: eCryptfs: Truncate path improvements
    On 2012-01-23 08:49:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Tyler Hicks <> wrote:
    > > As Linus pointed out[1], eCryptfs needs more checks around its truncate path.
    > > The first patch in this series makes it possible for an eCryptfs truncate
    > > operation to be gracefully interrupted by a fatal signal. The second adds
    > > checks for eCryptfs inode changes in setattr. The third is simply removal of
    > > an old, unused function.
    > Tyler, should I take these patches directly? Or are these just for
    > review and I should wait for a pull request?

    Just for review, as I'll send a pull request.

    I'll try to be more clear about that in the future.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-23 17:59    [W:0.018 / U:22.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site