[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Hung task when calling clone() due to netfilter/slab
Christoph Lameter <> writes:

> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> On the flip side removing from sysfs with locks held must be done
>> carefully, and as a default I would recommend not to hold locks over
>> removing things from sysfs. As removal blocks waiting for all of the
>> callers into sysfs those sysfs attributes to complete.
>> It looks like you are ok on the removal because none of the sysfs
>> attributes appear to take the slub_lock, just /proc/slabinfo. But
>> it does look like playing with fire.
> Ok then I guess my last patch is needed to make sysfs operations safe.
> It may be good to audit the kernel for locks being held while calling
> sysfs functions. Isnt there a lockdep check that ensures that no locks are
> held?

I don't see a no locks are held check but call_usermodehelper in the
blocking case could certainly use one.

For the sysfs remove case lockdep should work.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-20 21:41    [W:0.066 / U:6.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site