[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <> wrote:
> > ?BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
> > ?systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
> > ?for fstab stuff...
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.
> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.

I'm not saying I like /etc/foo.d/* (hell, sed in post-install is not
a big deal; not for fstab, not for inetd.conf, etc.), but yes,
complaints about changes that make life somewhat more difficult for
systemd are rather hypocritical, what with the embrace-and-extend
games they are playing.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-20 19:49    [W:0.121 / U:1.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site