[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 19:20, Denys Vlasenko <> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <> wrote:
>>  BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
>>  systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
>>  for fstab stuff...
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.

It's much more, and I don't think you have been involved in defining
the focus of it, and the systemd people do not necessary come to the
same conclusion as you.

> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.

You are free to express your worries somewhere else. Don't hijack
treads with completely unrelated stuff. That's not welcome in this
thread and not in general.

> What a *heck* is this?

A platform.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-20 19:31    [W:0.108 / U:1.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site