Messages in this thread | | | From | "Luck, Tony" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface | Date | Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:37:45 +0000 |
| |
> > + /* TODO(kees): We cannot unload ramoops since pstore doesn't support > > + * unregistering yet. > > + */ > > Well that sucks. Is pstore getting fixed?
While it might be useful for developers who have machines that support multiple back-ends to load & unload - there really isn't any credible end-user case for it - so it has a very low priority. Perhaps zero (it would complicate the code for no useful purpose).
Even for development there's a lot of re-booting (after all, pstore is really about saving the kernel log when the system crashes :-).
-Tony
| |