Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:00:02 +0800 | Subject | Re: [Question] sched: Should nr_uninterruptible be decremented in ttwu_do_activate()? | From | Hillf Danton <> |
| |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michael Wang > <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> I think the task in rq->wake_list should already have state:TASK_WAKING, >> because it's a wake list. >> > But, what I got by means of TASK_WAKING is this task is about to RUN, > very soon it'll have TASK_RUNNING state. And, if I hadn't miss any > portion of code, then rq->wake_list doesn't have TASK_WAKING state. > Hi Rakib
The question maybe settled down by adding a BUG_ON or similar to capture what you concern, and wait results while drinking tea or coffee.
Best regards Hillf
| |